![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,912
|
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
Why not just add a taller upper ball joint for the same effect?
With 1" narrowed arms (quicker angle change for more camber gain) and .50" taller upper ball joints my C10 had -1.6 degrees gain per inch of travel compared to -.86 per inch stock. You also gain camber when turning with a lot of caster so you may want to map out exactly how much camber gain you're getting to see if you actually need that much.
__________________
Project Goldilocks '66 C10 Short Fleet BBW Build '65 C10 Highly Detailed Stock Restoration Thread '78 Camaro Targa Roof Build '55 International Metal/Body/Paint Work '66 F100 Full Rotisserie Restoration '40 Packard 120 Convertible Coupe Restoration How To Restore and Detail an Original Gauge Cluster How To Detail Sand Body Panels, Edges, Corners, Etc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,666
|
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
Quote:
As for the mod. I think of it as the icing on the cake of the traditional mod of moving the lower A arm forward. Needed no, but adds a little bit of confidence to the end off tire grip or your limits. What ever happens first. I want to learn how to measure suspension gains one day. My uncle gave me a old kit he had for rebuilding rear ends. Which has the guage to measure the run out is it? Plus I have another C20 crossmember I will mod, rebuild, and store for my future square body Suburban or crew cab. I need a matching pair. Come to think of it. I like pairs of other things too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|