06-25-2007, 10:52 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 55
|
1972 door problems
i just had the truck repainted and bodywork done, looks great, the only issue is inclines or unlevel ground and doors open and shut hard. next questions is, are rocker boxes the same as torch boxes as the are not in good shape.i saw on a thred last week for link to buy new ones. just wondering is this my problem or should frame ties be an option. anyone have the same problems or cures i would appriciate it thanks scott. also how do post pics
|
06-25-2007, 01:04 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 67
|
Re: 1972 door problems
Post pics by setting up a free account at www.photobucket.com. Then upload your pics to their website. Simply copy the link they provide for your pic into your text where you want the pic to show up.
Good luck! |
06-28-2007, 02:13 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,514
|
Re: 1972 door problems
Torque boxes and rocker boxes are the same thing. Bad rocker boxes (I have seen them completely rusted out) will allow body flex, but even a Blazer with good boxes will flex to a degree. There's more than the boxes also, there's the front cab supports, lower a-pillar and lower b-pillar areas that can also cause problems if they are rusted away.
Good luck, Rg
__________________
Roger '68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675 '69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer '70 GMC Jimmy 2wd '73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203 Ideas - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851743 |
06-28-2007, 04:50 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: 1972 door problems
Mine does the same thing. Especially after riding down a rough road. But sometimes they won't even open, so I have to hit real hard on top of the door lock & it'll pop open All to say my rocker boxes are in pretty good shape, but the body bushings are basically gone. I think that's my problem, may be yours too!
__________________
'72 C to K20 "Cannibalizer" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...32#post8653432 '85 K30 "Big Nassy" [B]'85 C10 [B] "Corpse" '01 2500 Suburban ...party wagon & tow truck '06 Silverado SS...DD '06 C1500 WT...DD '07 Classic C1500 WT...DD Built & sold cause can't keep 'em all: '72 Blazer "The Bucket" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433190 '55 Chevy straight axle gasser https://www.trifive.com/forums/showthread.php?t=173938 '69 Pro Street Chevelle http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=332541 '86 M1031 CUCV http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=553619 |
06-28-2007, 08:17 PM | #5 |
Just need a couple more parts.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 470
|
Re: 1972 door problems
My 72 had one door that I adjusted and played with for a year.
An old body guy looked at it and in less than 1/2 an hour had it working perfectly. He put an extra shim between one of the body bushings and the body.It has been working great.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- 1947 Studebaker M5 project to match the camping trailer. 1950 Chev 4x4 Pickup 1958 Shasta Airflyte Travel trailer (fresh restoration) 1971 C/10 Pickup(Frame off Restoration) 1972 K5 Blazer CST (Daily Driver & My Company Truck) 1976 Honda CB750 Bobber 1988 Jaguar XJ12 Last edited by VinceY; 06-28-2007 at 08:17 PM. |
06-28-2007, 09:52 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: 1972 door problems
If you have your hardtop on, body flex should be a minimum with solid rocker/torque boxes and good rocker panels assuming you have decent body to chassis rubber mounts. With the top off, all bets are off as Chevy had body flex problems and had to reinforce the door latches for just the problem you are having. Even perfect boxes, rubber mounts, and shimming, you can still get some body flex with the top off so don't expect too much ---just enjoy it as part of the Classic ride! hehehehe
|
Bookmarks |
|
|