|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What fender opening do you want | |||
| 2" higher, 4" longer, stock width |
   
|
18 | 21.43% |
| 3" higher, 6" longer, Stock width |
  
|
8 | 9.52% |
| 4" higher, 8" longer, Stock width |
  
|
5 | 5.95% |
| 2" Higher, 4" longer, 1.5" wide flare |
  
|
9 | 10.71% |
| 3" higher, 6" longer, 2.5" wide flare |
  
|
15 | 17.86% |
| 4" higher, 6" longer, 3.5" wide flare |
  
|
12 | 14.29% |
| Max opening- 6" higher, 10" longer, Stock width |
|
4 | 4.76% |
| Max opening- 6" higher, 10" longer, 3"-4" wide flare |
|
12 | 14.29% |
| You don't want fiberglass fenders |
|
6 | 7.14% |
| If the price is right, the size opening doesn't matter |
|
15 | 17.86% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-06-2008, 06:43 PM
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,904
|
Re: Interest for High rise(pre-runner style?) Fenders Fiberglass
I think a large wheel arch without the bulge is a good idea. It would make for a much cleaner look but give the clearance needed. I think perhaps 2 levels might be needed. Perhaps a wheel arch that is 2" or 3" bigger for the stock (or small lifted) guys only running 33" and wanting 35". And then a fender with a 5-6" larger arch for the guys wanting 40"s. I believe the small arch would be preferred.
I am not a 67-72 guy, mainly 73-87... a 73-87 2wd (no lift) with a fiberglass flared fender (3" bulge and 2-3" larger wheel arch) could fit 35" tires. Without the bulge I believe only 33"s may have been possible. Just my $0.02.
__________________
Jon 1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED 1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231 .... Oklahoma Roll Call |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode