|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
09-05-2008, 08:35 AM
|
#1 |
|
Jon@AirRideTech
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jasper Indiana
Posts: 101
|
Re: 67-72 vs 73-87 lower control arms
the control arms are the same from 63-87 only thing that changed are the ball joints. As for plate vs cup on our standard cool ride we use a lower cup style bracket and on our tubular arms we use a flat plate....
|
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 09:40 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
|
Re: 67-72 vs 73-87 lower control arms
Quote:
__________________
 CHEVY ONLY
Last edited by joe231; 09-05-2008 at 09:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 07:58 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,149
|
Re: 67-72 vs 73-87 lower control arms
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2008, 07:28 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 213
|
Re: 67-72 vs 73-87 lower control arms
well since we never did figure out what the problem was, i decided to pick up some '69 lcas...except it kinda came with the rest of the truck
 i swapped out the suspension that was in it (6 lug) for my old one. i'm gonna clean up the lca's from this '69 and use those since the plates i bought work with them, gonna be fun  
Last edited by dubdeuce80; 09-09-2008 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
