|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-10-2011, 10:56 AM
|
#1 |
|
Happy to be here
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Air ride removal, back to static?
The only way I see it makes sense is if your going with a full coil over system. If you wanted to make it more competitive on the track, I would follow your logic. Even if that is your goal, I would try to tune what you have before starting from scratch.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
|
|
|
05-10-2011, 11:01 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,149
|
Re: Air ride removal, back to static?
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 05-10-2011 at 11:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
