Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-18-2011, 02:12 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ACT Australia
Posts: 4
|
GMC 228 exchange for 292
I currently have a 1947 GMC 1/2 ton pickup with a 228 engine in it, (the engine is not going) the question is, can I bolt up a 292 to the gearbox and make up some engine mounts?
|
10-18-2011, 02:20 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,625
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
I believe the bellhousing is different. I also think it would be best than to rely on a 64 year old transmission
Grab a NV3500 (5 speed) and a non-torque tube rearend 8.5" (a 3.42 or 3.73) from a s10 Blazer 4X4 (92-up) works well.
__________________
1969 307, t350 1950 Chevy Wagon 1978 Big 10 1967 C10, 250,3-OTT |
10-18-2011, 05:27 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ACT Australia
Posts: 4
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
I understand what you are saying.
I have a 1967 donor with all the running gear / motor 292 the original gearbox and I have a comaro diff. Do you know what gearboxes came in the C10 1967 1/2 ton pickup it is a stock 292 and it is 4 speed box? How do I tell the difference between the Sagnaw or a Muncie? Would the box in the donor 67 be a good option to put in the 1947 GMC pickup? I would really like to be able to pickup one of the gearboxes you are describing, but they are just not off the shelf here, being in Australia has its disadvantages. |
10-18-2011, 07:13 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ACT Australia
Posts: 4
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
As they say I have let my fingers do the walking, research has proved to me that I have an SM465 box.
So in your opinion if I run the following I would have a pretty good set up. Engine -1967/292 Gearbox - SM465 Diff - Comaro - It is a drum brake 3.08 or 3.31 or it is close to this ratio. Last edited by Sixty7292; 10-18-2011 at 07:21 AM. Reason: incorrect information |
10-21-2011, 08:43 AM | #5 |
Hollister Road Co.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,131
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
The weak point will be the camaro rear. I would try for a truck 12 bolt rear if you can. The 292 with a granny gear will rip open a camaro axle.
|
10-21-2011, 09:49 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
we use those year 64 old transmissions in our jeeps on rocks and everywere else with no problems. So swap it for an over drive if you want that but I wouldnt worry about it s age.
|
10-21-2011, 09:54 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
Quote:
|
|
10-21-2011, 10:00 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
Isnt the 12 bolt too wide for the AD truck?
|
10-21-2011, 06:27 PM | #9 |
Hollister Road Co.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,131
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
You can narrow them.
|
10-22-2011, 07:12 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ACT Australia
Posts: 4
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
AD truck, excuse my ignorance but what does this mean? is it the model?
Question, if I run the original diff from the 47 its probably going to be to lower ratio, I have the original diff in the 67 C10, that would mean I would exchange the complete running gear from the 67 C10 into the (AD) truck. Is a standard 67 C10 diff the correct width to fit in the (AD) truck? |
10-22-2011, 11:05 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
Yeah, but if I were going to put that much effort into I would do a 9" f#@d. The 12bolt isn't that much stronger than a 8.5" 10 bolt.
|
10-22-2011, 11:13 AM | #12 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: GMC 228 exchange for 292
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|