![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Eustis, FL
Posts: 124
|
Re: Intake and carb choice. Holley or Edelbrock. Stall convertor
I'm not opposed to holleys and yes for true performance they are the best design but every carb has its place. I have been happy with edelbrocks and have had good luck with q-jets especially in the offroad world. Traditionally afb's and q-jets have worked better of hillclimbs etc. while the holleys design tends to allow them to flood easier on an incline. I've got a 750 holley on the shelf for a future street project though and am considering it for my 400 in my C30.
Posted via Mobile Device |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
My Carbon Footprint
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
|
Re: Intake and carb choice. Holley or Edelbrock. Stall convertor
Quote:
JKeith.....350 "stock" heads could be 2.02 fuelie if an LT-1 but not likely. if you have an average mid 70's + motor, those heads are probably small valved and restricted. Be careful with cam and carb choice. Like my wife says "keep it small honey"!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Eustis, FL
Posts: 124
|
Re: Intake and carb choice. Holley or Edelbrock. Stall convertor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|