|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
08-12-2012, 08:44 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chantilly virginia
Posts: 44
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
I read in a post that Nate prefers the trailing arms to the 4link unless you are making serious power. It got me questioning the pros and cons of each.
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 01:44 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,149
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
The truck arms allow for a larger/wider set-up. Truck arms are also longer & the longer the bar, the better the ride quality (even when comparing different 4-bar set-ups).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 08:36 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chantilly virginia
Posts: 44
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Running 10 wide now would like to run 12.
Do trailing arms ride noticeably better? Does either setup corner better than the other? Posted via Mobile Device |
|
|
|
|
08-24-2015, 12:13 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 869
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
