The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2014, 02:55 PM   #1
TJ's Chevy
Post Whore
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,403
Re: 66 230 rochester 1bbl dual carb linkage

Quote:
Originally Posted by papaws66 View Post
okay thanks. I thought it should, but couldn't find anywhere that it came with it. after looking in the reviews on speedwaymotors.com i found that it does come with a linkage, but the guy said it was junk.. hopefully he just doesn't know what he's doing and i can get it to work! and hopefully the exhaust will give the "wow" factor i want it to! some more power too! would it be beneficial to install a lump port kit? i've read that i could loose some low end torque with that, which i don't want to do..
The lump port kit is very helpful....as far as losing low end torque...you may loose a tiny bit, but your gain will make up for it. A "lump port head" which usually consists of- lump ports, 1.94 intake and 1.60 exhaust valves will in itself give an increase of 35+ hp...add a good cam and you add another 50+ hp. If your going to do lump ports...its well worth it to go to a slightly bigger intake valve...1.84 or the stock 1.72....that'll allow more flow which will give more power...and keeping the stock exhaust valve of 1.50 will keep your low end torque. The stock cam is a super low duration...advertised 230 degrees 196 @ .50 I believe, with .376 lift on a 114 or even a 116 lobe center...perrty much means you'll peak torque at 2500 rpm or less. So yes...lump ports will help...and more compression would to. LPG pistons are available from summit racing...something like $250 for a set of 6..and you'll get around 9:5:1 compression versus 8:5:1. Thus again...more power...if ya want...you can keep an eye pealed on my build thread. I'm hotroding a 292 I6....and in a few weeks my engine will be complete.
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2014, 04:06 PM   #2
papaws66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bostic nc
Posts: 24
Re: 66 230 rochester 1bbl dual carb linkage

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ's Chevy View Post
The lump port kit is very helpful....as far as losing low end torque...you may loose a tiny bit, but your gain will make up for it. A "lump port head" which usually consists of- lump ports, 1.94 intake and 1.60 exhaust valves will in itself give an increase of 35+ hp...add a good cam and you add another 50+ hp. If your going to do lump ports...its well worth it to go to a slightly bigger intake valve...1.84 or the stock 1.72....that'll allow more flow which will give more power...and keeping the stock exhaust valve of 1.50 will keep your low end torque. The stock cam is a super low duration...advertised 230 degrees 196 @ .50 I believe, with .376 lift on a 114 or even a 116 lobe center...perrty much means you'll peak torque at 2500 rpm or less. So yes...lump ports will help...and more compression would to. LPG pistons are available from summit racing...something like $250 for a set of 6..and you'll get around 9:5:1 compression versus 8:5:1. Thus again...more power...if ya want...you can keep an eye pealed on my build thread. I'm hotroding a 292 I6....and in a few weeks my engine will be complete.
lots of great info! thanks!
papaws66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2014, 07:11 PM   #3
old cool
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 206
Re: 66 230 rochester 1bbl dual carb linkage

Just curious. Did GM still use 230's in 1966? I thought the base engine was a 250 inline. That is true of my 66 GMC.
old cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2014, 08:34 PM   #4
papaws66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bostic nc
Posts: 24
Re: 66 230 rochester 1bbl dual carb linkage

Quote:
Originally Posted by old cool View Post
Just curious. Did GM still use 230's in 1966? I thought the base engine was a 250 inline. That is true of my 66 GMC.
my 230 is the stock engine. in 66 chevy had a 230 L6, 250 L6 and 292 L6 and various v8's (not sure what they are, as i don't care to have one in my truck.. lol)
papaws66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
230 straight piped, dual carb linkage, rochester 1bbl dual setup


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com