The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2004, 11:18 PM   #1
NPilot1975
Senior Member
 
NPilot1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 891
Lowered Truck Question

I have a ECE 4/6 drop on my truck and want to go a lot lower. I am thinking about using the Air Ride front A-arms in the front and using bridges in the back to get it low. I am looking for detailed descriptions and pix of lowered trucks. I am trying to decide rather to keep the original trailing arms or going with a 4-link set-up. I am also wondering where the best place to mount the bags to get the most movement of the suspension. I want to go really low but still be able to drive my truck. I am considering a good suspension and a small body drop. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanx
__________________
1972 Blazer body...need to get a thread started for the rest of the story
NPilot1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 12:35 AM   #2
PTS Kustoms
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roswell, N.M.
Posts: 210
I Did Not Know That Airide's A-arms Were Available Yet. I Checked Last Week And They Told Me Another 30 Days.
PTS Kustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 02:49 AM   #3
NPilot1975
Senior Member
 
NPilot1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 891
I haven't bought any parts, that is just my plan right now.
__________________
1972 Blazer body...need to get a thread started for the rest of the story
NPilot1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 03:13 AM   #4
2low72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cheyenne, Wy
Posts: 555
Let's see some pic's. I'm wanting to bag my truck but it's to pricey for me right now. Here is a link to see my truck. I think it's lower than 4/6.
http://www.ctwtrucks.com/2low72/
2low72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 10:01 AM   #5
FRENCHBLUE72
PROJECT 7DEUCE
 
FRENCHBLUE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,606
Take a look at slammed 67's web site on his gmc he has a pretty good write up and pic's on his truck..
__________________
GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS



MEMBER #6377

72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free.

Project "7DEUCE"

check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665



Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P..
FRENCHBLUE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 11:39 AM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,132
Thumbs up

How much lower do you want to go? The AirRide arms I've seen look like some quality pieces.... unfortunately, they don't make them for the 63-87 suspension yet. I've heard they're a month out for a couple of months now. When I spoke w/Darren @ AirRide, word is they still haven't started them. Knowing that, a month for fabrication to production is extremely optimistic.

For the front, I used 2.5" spindles w/1 coil cut from the factory 30yr old springs. This combo dropped my truck almost 6". With 215/75/15's up front on 15x6.5" van ralleys, I buzz the top of the inner-fenderwells on some dips (but only if going too fast). For normal roads it doesn't rub. I installed a 73-87 1 1/16 sway bar w/eurathane bushings & trimmed the factory bumpstops 1/2 ".

For the rear, if you want to get it low but still use it like a truck, go w/air bags. I used Firestone 224C's (approx 25-2600#) bolted directly to the trailing arms & added 1.5" lowering blocks from Classic Perf Products. This requires relocating the shocks for more travel & installing a c-section (I got mine from CPP). At normal ride height (30psi is my preference), my axle tube rides about an inch into the bottom of the framerail. When I hook up my car hauler, I air it up to about 60-70psi which returns the truck to unloaded ride height & adds an inch for extra travel. The c-sections allow more travel than the bed floor does in my case....the top of the pumpkin occasionally hits the bed floor (again usually only on dips @ too high of a speed).

I've used this truck daily for 3+ yrs w/o problems. Any lower & I would have to lose or raise the front inner wheelwells & cut out the bed floor.
Attached Images
 
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 07:15 PM   #7
NPilot1975
Senior Member
 
NPilot1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 891
Scoti,

Thanx for the info. I am not going to start actually working on my truck for a year, as I am deploying overseas. I want to get an idea and maybe buy some parts while I am gone. I may try and get my brother to do some of the work for me while I am gone. He and my dad own a auto repair shop with alignment equipment. I definitely plan to bag my truck at all 4 corners. I am also considering raising my bed floor until the wheel wells are even with the bed rails. This should give me at least 4 inches more clearance in the rear. The biggest thing I can't figure out is, if I put bridges in the back, will the stock trailing arms work for a really big drop or if I should go with a 4 link to work better. I think the trailing arms my put the rearend at a bad angle once I get so low. I am also thinking about getting ECE's new crossmember and flipping the trailing arm mounts upside down to raise the point at which the trailing arms attach.
__________________
1972 Blazer body...need to get a thread started for the rest of the story
NPilot1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2004, 07:55 PM   #8
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by NPilot1975
.... I think the trailing arms my put the rearend at a bad angle once I get so low. I am also thinking about getting ECE's new crossmember and flipping the trailing arm mounts upside down to raise the point at which the trailing arms attach.
Yes, once it gets extremely low the factory angles will be compromised. Flipping the trailing arm mounts is a good idea & if you can fabricate your 'bridges', you can re-weld new trailing arm mounts to also improve pinion angle.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com