|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2025, 11:09 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 616
|
Re: 65-C20 Assembly question
I also feel that the problem is the lack of weight. As the frame moves closer to the rear axel the locating arm will push the axel housing towards the passenger side. That rear suspension setup had some truly weird geometry in rough terrain, which is probably why it wasn’t used for the 4x4 models
__________________
65 short stepside K10 292-SM420-T221 8 lug closed D44 front NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| c20 2wd fleetside, eaton ho52, long bed |
|
|
Threaded Mode