The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2010, 10:26 PM   #1
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
427 or 6.0

What do you guys think. 427 tall block/4l80 or throw in a 6.0 fi/4l80?

Already have the 427 but all these 6.0 swaps make me want one of these. Either way ill be dropin in the 4l80. It will be mostly a weekend/cruz night truck. Might drive it to work every now and then. Either way I wand at least 450hp out of it.

What do ya think?
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 11:06 PM   #2
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: 427 or 6.0

427!!! Nothing but cubic inches of Detroit muscle!! Now if you have to build the 427 to 450 HP, you might be better off with the 6.0. A few parts will get you to 450 HP either with a carb or FI.
__________________
Gerardo a.k.a. Mad Chemist
Silverado XST videos
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 11:19 PM   #3
thepenguin99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Millington TN
Posts: 435
Re: 427 or 6.0

imo big block if it is going to be more of a toy than daily transportation.
thepenguin99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 11:32 PM   #4
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: 427 or 6.0

LSx is the only way to go. Throw a cam, intake and heads on the 6.0 and you are at 500 hp/tq . What more do you need?
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 12:49 AM   #5
Gregs71
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amador County, Ca.
Posts: 229
Re: 427 or 6.0

The older i get, the more I like the reliability and power of modern fuel injection. Then again 427 sounds fast...
__________________
1995 GMC 4x4 1/2 ton
1999 Jeep Wrangler w/ 33's
68 camaro 350/350
1987 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4
Suzuki DRZ 400s Dual Sport
1971 chevy long bed 2x4
194? Dodge 2.5 ton
1980 Chevy Cheyenne 4x4 1/2 ton I6/sm455
1989 Chevy V30 crewcab dually 454/TH400
Gregs71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 12:57 AM   #6
85burb
Registered User
 
85burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
Re: 427 or 6.0

Do the 6.0 cam heads and intake and of course a tune and easy 500-550. dyno proven. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...est/index.html
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60
84 c20 5.3/sm465
85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60
91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60
2017 Silverado whipple 5.3
1964 Vw beetle
1974 vw beetle
85burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 01:38 AM   #7
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
Re: 427 or 6.0

Man the small cam made more power than I was planing. That's a beast.

Yes I will be building one or the other. The bb sit in my shop just a block.

It will be just a toy so I was leaning towrds the bb but those ls motor are make'n some powere with very few mods. Hmmm may have to get another truck and put the bb in the gray truck and ls swap in a shortwide.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 05:27 AM   #8
crm318
Alright Alright Alright
 
crm318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 1,672
Re: 427 or 6.0

If money and modification is not a problem, I think the 6.0 is the way to go. The 427 (tall deck) will only have low end grunt as where the 6.0 will have great torque and everything in between including milage.
__________________
1972 Cheyenne
Chevrolet red and white
357ci, Vortec heads,
GM Performance high rise intake,
Comp 268H .454/.454 218/218 110 LSA
Quadrajet carb, Flowtech headers, 2.25 40 series
HEI, Curve kit, TH 350, 3.07 gears
275/60/15s on 15x8 rallies
crm318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 09:07 AM   #9
Jonboy
Slots go on anything!
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
Re: 427 or 6.0

I would vote 6.0 over a tall deck engine, too. If it wasn't a tall deck, that might be a different story. 6.0 with a few mods and a tune will be killer, though.
__________________
1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241
Jonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:46 AM   #10
STOCKISH
Formerly- 1972SuperCheyenne
 
STOCKISH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake Forest NC
Posts: 5,782
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
LSx is the only way to go. Throw a cam, intake and heads on the 6.0 and you are at 500 hp/tq . What more do you need?
And 20 MPG on the highway to boot.
__________________
--Josh

My Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=799218

A good crossthread is better than Loctite any day.

Life is not about what you have, but who you have to share it with.
STOCKISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:32 PM   #11
fpjr0
Registered User
 
fpjr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 202
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972SuperCheyenne View Post
And 20 MPG on the highway to boot.
x2

modern mpg, modern acceleration, older+modern=cool imo...
__________________
ONCE YOU GO LS, YOU NEVER WANT LESS!!

Last edited by fpjr0; 05-18-2010 at 10:41 PM.
fpjr0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 10:40 PM   #12
69BBsuburban
Right in front of you.
 
69BBsuburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
Re: 427 or 6.0

What's a 6.0?
I only know engines by their CUBIC INCHES.......haha.......
Too bad yer 427 wasn't a standard low deck.....build an L-88...
Gimme a GAS-GUZZLIN', carb'd big block over any FI "modern" throwaway engine.
FI doesn't give better reliabilty, just less maintainence....oh, and the ability to NOT be repaired along side the road when some electronic GIZMO decides it doesn't wanna play anymore....haha
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh
'78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454)
'90 Chevy Sport Truck
'68 Dodge Charger R/T
1930 Ford Model A
69BBsuburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2010, 11:45 PM   #13
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69BBsuburban View Post
What's a 6.0?
The 6.0 is the midsize truck motor of the LSx family. It's the cast iron version of the 5.3 with a bigger bore. If you really want a bad boy start with a 6.2 and build from there.


There are Corvetttes running around with normally aspirated LS motors pulling 600hp and cruising with the a/c on using pump gas. Crazy stuff coming out of these motors with the proper tune.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 12:04 AM   #14
Puglia10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 387
Re: 427 or 6.0

where can i find more info on a 6.0 swap into a c10?
Puglia10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 12:04 AM   #15
tdiffee
Registered User
 
tdiffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Memphis, tn
Posts: 65
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69BBsuburban View Post
What's a 6.0?
I only know engines by their CUBIC INCHES.......haha.......
Too bad yer 427 wasn't a standard low deck.....build an L-88...
Gimme a GAS-GUZZLIN', carb'd big block over any FI "modern" throwaway engine.
FI doesn't give better reliabilty, just less maintainence....oh, and the ability to NOT be repaired along side the road when some electronic GIZMO decides it doesn't wanna play anymore....haha
I disagree that FI does not give better reliability when I start looking for a 6.0 for my swap I will be shopping on price not milage because these engines just don't wear out they are good for 300k or more miles I know a guy that owns a salvage yard and he told me that the only way he can sell a 5.3 or a 6.0 is a package deal for a swap because no one has to replace them in their dd's. You hardly ever see a carbed engine with over 100k on it. I also believe burability comes from they way they are started with FI you just start it and it idles at the normal rpm range but with a carbed engine they rev up as soon as they fire up and most people sit there revving them up until they are warmed up.
__________________
Tim

87 Short Wide 305 TBI 700R4
86 Honda 350x (Resto Project Almost Complete)
07 Trailblazer SS (My Wife's Grocery Getter)
94 Camaro Z28
tdiffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 02:00 AM   #16
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
Re: 427 or 6.0

Well the 427 stays with the gray truck. Ol said no swap for the old girl. Buuuuut I am now looking for another truck for a swap. Junk yard here has a 5.3 now and says he will hold a 6.0 for me when he gets one in. So my titans for sale and the hunt is on for a 69-87 swb.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:38 AM   #17
BigBlocksRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
Re: 427 or 6.0

Comparably built, the LS will kick the old big block's butt.
If you're going to go with a big block, sell that 427 crank and pick up a stroker. Cubes rule!!!
BigBlocksRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 11:58 AM   #18
Jim85IROC
Registered User
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 502
Re: 427 or 6.0

427 sounds impressive, but it's essentially a 454 with a napoleon complex. I'd rather the 6.0. Now if we're talking built 454 vs. built 6.0, then I guess it would depend on whether it's a 2wd or 4wd truck. For 2wd, I'd rather the lighter weight of the 6.0, but if it's a 4x4, the weight is irrelevant and I'd rather the torque of the 454.
__________________
1987 GMC Sierra Classic 3500
454
TH400
My Sounddomain Page
Jim85IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 12:47 PM   #19
Pyrotechnic
Registered User
 
Pyrotechnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
Re: 427 or 6.0

The tall deck 427 is just not worth the time, unless you plan to use only the block and make a wild stroker motor out of it.

The 6.0L is a good choice and will get decent gas mileage.

If you want some cubic inches, try the 2001 and up 8.1L (496) out of a 3/4 or 1 ton truck.
__________________
1977 GMC Sierra Grande
Pyrotechnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 01:19 PM   #20
GmtGmt
Conversion Truck Addicted
 
GmtGmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 1,548
Re: 427 or 6.0

keep the 427 make it wild
if you wanted something modern with mileage and reliability get a honda or toyota
__________________
Thomas

Quote:
Tonight mine pulled a few cars out of snowbanks, and is sitting in my driveway, icicles on the grille, wheels just white cakes of snow, buried up to the lug nuts in powder, straps and chains wrapped around the bumpers, the outline of the wipers clear in 4 inches of snow on the windshield... A tired warrior of the 1980s in a world of low profile tires, front wheel drive, and plastic bumpers, where people stay in their houses until snowplows move the offending substance from their paths, too helpless to travel without AAA and chains and salt, clearing their windows with longhandled brushes while gently stepping around in the snow trying to stay nice and dry.
GmtGmt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 01:46 PM   #21
JEM
Ironmonger
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 127
Re: 427 or 6.0

If you're building a period-piece, you want the old-fashioned rod feel, build a big-block.

If you're building a driver, grab the 6.0.

Much less weight on the front wheels, far better accessories and bracketry, manifolding, etc. off the shelf, far easier to build to a modern standard of driveability.

Last edited by JEM; 05-19-2010 at 01:46 PM.
JEM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 05:02 PM   #22
menace121978
Registered User
 
menace121978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: orangevale, ca
Posts: 3,626
Re: 427 or 6.0

cool thread! i love hearing everyones opinion on this subject.

obviously i'd go with the new technology myself... i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
__________________
"Dennis the Menace"



1978 Silverado (2wd, 1/2 ton, short bed)complete nut & bolt frame off restomod LQ9/4L80E
MY LS SWAP/FRAME OFF BUILD BOOK

2006 TBSS way too much to list
menace121978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 06:31 PM   #23
69BBsuburban
Right in front of you.
 
69BBsuburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by menace121978 View Post
i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
I've driven BRAND NEW Corvettes, etc....
I still prefer the brute force and crudeness of my old jalopies....it's more than just the performance....there's a certain style and "coolness" factor no newer, plastic car can ever dublicate. Just my old school .02.....I'm an oddball
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh
'78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454)
'90 Chevy Sport Truck
'68 Dodge Charger R/T
1930 Ford Model A

Last edited by 69BBsuburban; 05-19-2010 at 06:31 PM.
69BBsuburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:24 PM   #24
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
Re: 427 or 6.0

I agree the old just has that "coolness" to it. I forsee it as nothing less than a 496 when its all said and done. It will be just the cruzzer so load and lopy are deffenitly in the mix for it. I love the old skool but the way the new motors are proven them selves is making me like them A LOT!

On a side note my dad told me my uncle parked his 70 up on the hill to roat. So I will be paying him a visit in the next few days. I've tried buyin his truck since I was 15 so we'll see if he will finaly come off of it. It will get a 6.0/4l80 if I can get it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:38 PM   #25
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: 427 or 6.0

6.0L or bigger LSx

the newer engines last longer because they are built better. for one thing...they have roller cam setups...a big difference over standard hydraulic lifter. The tolerances are different. etc.
The heads breathe like big block heads...providing lots of power in a smaller package.

oh...and here's mine...with the gen IV L92/LS3 style rectangular port heads...with huge 2.16 intake valves.
__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken

Last edited by 68GMCCustom; 05-19-2010 at 07:45 PM.
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com