05-17-2010, 10:26 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
427 or 6.0
What do you guys think. 427 tall block/4l80 or throw in a 6.0 fi/4l80?
Already have the 427 but all these 6.0 swaps make me want one of these. Either way ill be dropin in the 4l80. It will be mostly a weekend/cruz night truck. Might drive it to work every now and then. Either way I wand at least 450hp out of it. What do ya think?
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
05-17-2010, 11:06 PM | #2 |
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
427!!! Nothing but cubic inches of Detroit muscle!! Now if you have to build the 427 to 450 HP, you might be better off with the 6.0. A few parts will get you to 450 HP either with a carb or FI.
|
05-17-2010, 11:19 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Millington TN
Posts: 435
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
imo big block if it is going to be more of a toy than daily transportation.
|
05-17-2010, 11:32 PM | #4 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
LSx is the only way to go. Throw a cam, intake and heads on the 6.0 and you are at 500 hp/tq . What more do you need?
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
05-18-2010, 12:49 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Amador County, Ca.
Posts: 229
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
The older i get, the more I like the reliability and power of modern fuel injection. Then again 427 sounds fast...
__________________
1995 GMC 4x4 1/2 ton 1999 Jeep Wrangler w/ 33's 68 camaro 350/350 1987 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4 Suzuki DRZ 400s Dual Sport 1971 chevy long bed 2x4 194? Dodge 2.5 ton 1980 Chevy Cheyenne 4x4 1/2 ton I6/sm455 1989 Chevy V30 crewcab dually 454/TH400 |
05-18-2010, 12:57 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Do the 6.0 cam heads and intake and of course a tune and easy 500-550. dyno proven. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...est/index.html
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60 84 c20 5.3/sm465 85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60 91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60 2017 Silverado whipple 5.3 1964 Vw beetle 1974 vw beetle |
05-18-2010, 01:38 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Man the small cam made more power than I was planing. That's a beast.
Yes I will be building one or the other. The bb sit in my shop just a block. It will be just a toy so I was leaning towrds the bb but those ls motor are make'n some powere with very few mods. Hmmm may have to get another truck and put the bb in the gray truck and ls swap in a shortwide.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
05-18-2010, 05:27 AM | #8 |
Alright Alright Alright
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 1,672
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
If money and modification is not a problem, I think the 6.0 is the way to go. The 427 (tall deck) will only have low end grunt as where the 6.0 will have great torque and everything in between including milage.
__________________
1972 Cheyenne Chevrolet red and white 357ci, Vortec heads, GM Performance high rise intake, Comp 268H .454/.454 218/218 110 LSA Quadrajet carb, Flowtech headers, 2.25 40 series HEI, Curve kit, TH 350, 3.07 gears 275/60/15s on 15x8 rallies |
05-18-2010, 09:07 AM | #9 |
Slots go on anything!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
I would vote 6.0 over a tall deck engine, too. If it wasn't a tall deck, that might be a different story. 6.0 with a few mods and a tune will be killer, though.
__________________
1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241 |
05-18-2010, 10:46 AM | #10 |
Formerly- 1972SuperCheyenne
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake Forest NC
Posts: 5,782
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
And 20 MPG on the highway to boot.
__________________
--Josh My Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=799218 A good crossthread is better than Loctite any day. Life is not about what you have, but who you have to share it with. |
05-18-2010, 10:32 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 202
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
x2
modern mpg, modern acceleration, older+modern=cool imo...
__________________
ONCE YOU GO LS, YOU NEVER WANT LESS!! Last edited by fpjr0; 05-18-2010 at 10:41 PM. |
05-18-2010, 10:40 PM | #12 |
Right in front of you.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
What's a 6.0?
I only know engines by their CUBIC INCHES.......haha....... Too bad yer 427 wasn't a standard low deck.....build an L-88... Gimme a GAS-GUZZLIN', carb'd big block over any FI "modern" throwaway engine. FI doesn't give better reliabilty, just less maintainence....oh, and the ability to NOT be repaired along side the road when some electronic GIZMO decides it doesn't wanna play anymore....haha
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh '78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454) '90 Chevy Sport Truck '68 Dodge Charger R/T 1930 Ford Model A |
05-18-2010, 11:45 PM | #13 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
The 6.0 is the midsize truck motor of the LSx family. It's the cast iron version of the 5.3 with a bigger bore. If you really want a bad boy start with a 6.2 and build from there.
There are Corvetttes running around with normally aspirated LS motors pulling 600hp and cruising with the a/c on using pump gas. Crazy stuff coming out of these motors with the proper tune.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
05-19-2010, 12:04 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 389
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
where can i find more info on a 6.0 swap into a c10?
|
05-19-2010, 12:04 AM | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Memphis, tn
Posts: 65
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Quote:
__________________
Tim 87 Short Wide 305 TBI 700R4 86 Honda 350x (Resto Project Almost Complete) 07 Trailblazer SS (My Wife's Grocery Getter) 94 Camaro Z28 |
|
05-19-2010, 02:00 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Well the 427 stays with the gray truck. Ol said no swap for the old girl. Buuuuut I am now looking for another truck for a swap. Junk yard here has a 5.3 now and says he will hold a 6.0 for me when he gets one in. So my titans for sale and the hunt is on for a 69-87 swb.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
05-19-2010, 07:38 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Comparably built, the LS will kick the old big block's butt.
If you're going to go with a big block, sell that 427 crank and pick up a stroker. Cubes rule!!! |
05-19-2010, 11:58 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 502
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
427 sounds impressive, but it's essentially a 454 with a napoleon complex. I'd rather the 6.0. Now if we're talking built 454 vs. built 6.0, then I guess it would depend on whether it's a 2wd or 4wd truck. For 2wd, I'd rather the lighter weight of the 6.0, but if it's a 4x4, the weight is irrelevant and I'd rather the torque of the 454.
|
05-19-2010, 12:47 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
The tall deck 427 is just not worth the time, unless you plan to use only the block and make a wild stroker motor out of it.
The 6.0L is a good choice and will get decent gas mileage. If you want some cubic inches, try the 2001 and up 8.1L (496) out of a 3/4 or 1 ton truck.
__________________
1977 GMC Sierra Grande |
05-19-2010, 01:19 PM | #20 | |
Conversion Truck Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 1,551
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
keep the 427 make it wild
if you wanted something modern with mileage and reliability get a honda or toyota
__________________
Thomas Quote:
|
|
05-19-2010, 01:46 PM | #21 |
Ironmonger
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 127
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
If you're building a period-piece, you want the old-fashioned rod feel, build a big-block.
If you're building a driver, grab the 6.0. Much less weight on the front wheels, far better accessories and bracketry, manifolding, etc. off the shelf, far easier to build to a modern standard of driveability. Last edited by JEM; 05-19-2010 at 01:46 PM. |
05-19-2010, 05:02 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: orangevale, ca
Posts: 3,626
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
cool thread! i love hearing everyones opinion on this subject.
obviously i'd go with the new technology myself... i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
__________________
"Dennis the Menace" 1978 Silverado (2wd, 1/2 ton, short bed)complete nut & bolt frame off restomod LQ9/4L80E MY LS SWAP/FRAME OFF BUILD BOOK 2006 TBSS way too much to list |
05-19-2010, 06:31 PM | #23 | |
Right in front of you.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Quote:
I still prefer the brute force and crudeness of my old jalopies....it's more than just the performance....there's a certain style and "coolness" factor no newer, plastic car can ever dublicate. Just my old school .02.....I'm an oddball
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh '78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454) '90 Chevy Sport Truck '68 Dodge Charger R/T 1930 Ford Model A Last edited by 69BBsuburban; 05-19-2010 at 06:31 PM. |
|
05-19-2010, 07:24 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
I agree the old just has that "coolness" to it. I forsee it as nothing less than a 496 when its all said and done. It will be just the cruzzer so load and lopy are deffenitly in the mix for it. I love the old skool but the way the new motors are proven them selves is making me like them A LOT!
On a side note my dad told me my uncle parked his 70 up on the hill to roat. So I will be paying him a visit in the next few days. I've tried buyin his truck since I was 15 so we'll see if he will finaly come off of it. It will get a 6.0/4l80 if I can get it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
05-19-2010, 07:38 PM | #25 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
6.0L or bigger LSx
the newer engines last longer because they are built better. for one thing...they have roller cam setups...a big difference over standard hydraulic lifter. The tolerances are different. etc. The heads breathe like big block heads...providing lots of power in a smaller package. oh...and here's mine...with the gen IV L92/LS3 style rectangular port heads...with huge 2.16 intake valves.
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken Last edited by 68GMCCustom; 05-19-2010 at 07:45 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|