Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-20-2003, 10:04 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 128
|
Which Blazer is the most DESIREABLE??
I know "everyone" will have an opinion..and different tastes, but I was just wondering which of the 69-72's is the most desireable (am I spelling that right?!? desireable??..oh well) Surely there is one year that is more sought after than another. Since I'm a newbee at this, I'll ask the experts... Also, why would this particular year be the most expensive and or popular??
Also, is the GMC model worth more or less? Last edited by Mark70Z; 09-20-2003 at 10:08 PM. |
09-20-2003, 11:50 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 2,613
|
If I could have any Blazer/Jimmy- it would be a 72 CST/Sierra Grande, 2wd with all the goodies ( tach, tilt,ac, single wall top, etc )
72 because it's the last production year and Disc brakes up front. 2wd because they are rare, ride better, lighter, faster and just plain cool. I'm not gonna be wheelin in my old blazer anyway so why have all the headaches of a front drive train? Since I'm dreaming , I'll put a 67 Chev front clip on it and it will have it's own garage stall ,so the top will never be on it, again |
09-21-2003, 09:40 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WATAUGA,TX
Posts: 675
|
I have to agree because I do have a 72CST 2wd. Even though Im a little bit biased I think just having disc up front is worth having the 72 all by itself. Even though mine needs ton of work I get offers all the time to trade for much newer trucks or to sell. I do like the 67 pickup front ends a little better so I may convert mine. No matter what year just get one and have fun!
__________________
72 2wd 307/AT/AC/TILT WHEEL 78 JIMMY HIGH SIERRA |
09-21-2003, 10:48 AM | #4 |
The Blazer King
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Valrico, Fl (Tampa)
Posts: 1,212
|
I have a 71 with disks up front! But I would say the 70 2wd would be the most rare due to the extremely low production numbers and it being the first year produced.
__________________
72 2wd Blazer. Its the superbichinest, megacoolinest, superflowinest. |
09-21-2003, 11:35 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Victoria,Texas
Posts: 49
|
I also have a 71 Jimmy with disc in front... and it's for sale.. see post..
|
09-21-2003, 11:38 AM | #6 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
I don't think Jimmys could have the Sierra Grande package.
|
09-21-2003, 11:47 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Victoria,Texas
Posts: 49
|
Well, mine is an original 1971 GMC Jimmy Custom, 4WD, with Tilt, Tach, AC & Disc Brakes in the front. It is listed on the option/build sheet pasted to the glove box lid...
|
09-21-2003, 11:55 AM | #8 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
It says Sierra Grande on the option sheet?
|
09-21-2003, 02:02 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 275
|
72' Blazer Highlanders are rare. Only one
year and most loaded with all the goodies. Just MHO, see I've got one.
__________________
Joe Peters the HatGuy 72' K5 Highlander My Daily Driver http://www.pbhats.com/BLAZER/index.html |
09-21-2003, 08:00 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
My personal preference would be a 1970 CST with optional disc brakes (if they were available on 4x4). If not, oh well. 292/4 speed, a/c, tilt, tach, etc.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
09-21-2003, 08:52 PM | #11 | |
All stock and staying that way
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Elkland, PA
Posts: 1,845
|
Quote:
I agree! That would be a neat combo.. However, the 292 and the discs were not 1970 Blazer options. |
|
09-21-2003, 10:01 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canton, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,119
|
I've got a 72 Blazer CST Highlander (Just found out it is a Highlander), but I really like the GMC grill. When my rich uncle gets out of the poorhouse I'd like to have a Jimmy to go along with the blazer.
__________________
Jeremy (NUBOMB) 72K5 CST 350/350/205 1951 Chevy 1/2 ton North Georgia Group "... And the first rule to being a man is you gotta spend your life doing crap you don't wanna do." Red Forman. |
09-21-2003, 10:13 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 1,147
|
I like the '72's. Probably since I've got a Blazer and LWB in the satble already. Now i need the 'burbon and the collection will be complete (or will it just be getting started??)
__________________
'72 Chevy K20 - 383/4sp/205 - SOLD after 41 years in the family Next project - K/5 Tahoe (71 Blazer on 99 Tahoe chassis) Build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=789958 |
09-21-2003, 11:22 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
Quote:
the discs I wasnt sure on, I have seen some '70 2wd pickups that had optional discs, I would guess they were made later in the production run, and thought it would be neat if they appeared on a 4x4.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
|
09-22-2003, 12:55 PM | #15 |
SKINNY TIRES RULE!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 11,038
|
Wouldn't the 1969 first production (#1 off the assembly line) be the most valuable?
__________________
bouncytruck 1972 K5 The Hauler 1994 K1500 Suburban The Daily2010 Kia Soul Wife's Ride2014 Fiat 500L |
09-22-2003, 04:07 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 128
|
Question: Is the Highlander option just added features on a 1972? What would the extra options include that the CST package does not?
HatGuy....I assume that the interior you pictured is part of that package. Looks GREAT!!!! |
09-22-2003, 04:50 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canton, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,119
|
My Highlander was evidently messed up by a previous owner. As far as I know the only difference is the seats. Mine should look like Hatguy's. Somebody changed out the seats so I couldn't tell it was a highlander. What other things came with the highlander option?
__________________
Jeremy (NUBOMB) 72K5 CST 350/350/205 1951 Chevy 1/2 ton North Georgia Group "... And the first rule to being a man is you gotta spend your life doing crap you don't wanna do." Red Forman. |
09-23-2003, 11:47 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 275
|
Yes the plaid came in 4 colors
orange, red, green, gray & blue. I nees to replace the white vinal on the front seats. Two different shops have said they can do that. back seat has been ib storage 16 years and only has 1 small rip on the side.
__________________
Joe Peters the HatGuy 72' K5 Highlander My Daily Driver http://www.pbhats.com/BLAZER/index.html |
09-23-2003, 12:43 PM | #19 |
SKINNY TIRES RULE!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 11,038
|
There is a Blazer with the plaid interior on e-bay right now. Maybe it is a highlander?
__________________
bouncytruck 1972 K5 The Hauler 1994 K1500 Suburban The Daily2010 Kia Soul Wife's Ride2014 Fiat 500L |
09-23-2003, 04:12 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 128
|
Does anyone make any reproduction Highlander interior?? Sounds like some nice interior. I'd like to have that type.
HatGuy....since you have one, is this the only difference between a CST and a Highlander is the interior seats? Any help would be great. |
Bookmarks |
|
|