The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2023, 12:29 PM   #1
sanddunecoon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: jefferson
Posts: 40
88-95 Bench Seat question

How much of a difference does the 88-95 OBS seat make in terms of leg room? Being 6'4" i'm looking for any gains that i can get but dont want to go through the trouble of sourcing one and doing the upholstery if its negligible.
sanddunecoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2023, 05:59 PM   #2
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,216
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

To me it is more comfortable (6'1"), but not a dramatic difference in leg room.
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2023, 08:48 PM   #3
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,475
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

I am only 5’8” so leg and head room is not a huge concern for me but I do find the seat in my 67 overall more comfortable than stock and I like the head rests just in case I’m ever rear ended my head won’t hit the back glass.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2023, 02:56 PM   #4
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,165
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

I can't speak directly to a 67-72 but in a Square Body I can tell an appreciable difference. I am 6'1" and the OBS seat (on square body tracks) gave me roughly an inch in both directions. It's been almost 20 years since I did it, but I like it very much.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2023, 07:11 PM   #5
dagnabbitt
Senior Member
 
dagnabbitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

I have one in my 72 GMC thread below. I wouldn't say it offers a bunch more room... maybe an inch. But the benefit is that it is one of the most comfortable OEM seats you can get, and it has a thin back on it as opposed to most aftermarket ones so you can put it all the way to the back window.

I am assuming you do not have tilt. If you are thinking of best value for your dollar I would invest in it. They are a little expensive but really cool in one of these old trucks. As a bonus, you can get them shortened.

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=828133

And as mentioned above: a less dishy steering wheel can offer more room.
__________________
DAVE
Edmonton, Alberta
1959 Apache
1967 K20
1968 C20
1970 C10
1972 GMC 2500
1981 C10
dagnabbitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2023, 08:34 PM   #6
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,216
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

Here is mine . I believe it is frim a 90 model. Had it recovered when it was putin truck avou 15 years ago.definitely better ghan stock to me..
Attached Images
 
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2023, 09:05 PM   #7
sanddunecoon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: jefferson
Posts: 40
Re: 88-95 Bench Seat question

Quote:
Originally Posted by dagnabbitt View Post
I have one in my 72 GMC thread below. I wouldn't say it offers a bunch more room... maybe an inch. But the benefit is that it is one of the most comfortable OEM seats you can get, and it has a thin back on it as opposed to most aftermarket ones so you can put it all the way to the back window.

I am assuming you do not have tilt. If you are thinking of best value for your dollar I would invest in it. They are a little expensive but really cool in one of these old trucks. As a bonus, you can get them shortened.

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=828133

And as mentioned above: a less dishy steering wheel can offer more room.
Thank you all for the responses, helpful. I have a line on a Cheyenne seat ( which is a vinyl covered foam and not a the glued cover to the foam, which can make the reupholstery process a little better . I will try it out, anything to get a little bit more comfort and even and inch of room will help. I'm almost thinking of cutting down the brake and clutch pedals to reposition the pads in a better position.

dagnabbitt, the first thing i did when i aquired the truck was put a tilt in it. made a world of difference, its stock length thought..
sanddunecoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com